So how do we stay afloat in this sea of acronyms? We all gather, organize and analyze information in our own unique way. But there are a few common techniques you can use to help separate fact from fiction, meat from gristle, hype from news…well, you get the idea. Here’s my version of the RAAT (Redundant Acronym Analysis Tool), a series of questions you can ask yourself to help you qualify a new acronym.

Alphabet Soup

Reza Raji | Echelon Corporation

Home Toys Article
Home Toys Article
- December 2000 -
[HTI Home Page]

[Click Message To Learn More]


by
Reza Raji, Director of Business Development
Echelon Corporation

So how do we stay afloat in this sea of acronyms?  We all gather, organize and analyze information in our own unique way.  But there are a few common techniques you can use to help separate fact from fiction, meat from gristle, hype from newswell, you get the idea.  Heres my version of the RAAT (Redundant Acronym Analysis Tool), a series of questions you can ask yourself to help you qualify a new acronym. 

Youre trying to decipher the alphabet soup of home automation.  Youve read up on the protocols, technologies and the seemingly endless company announcements and feel that you have a handle on what is going on in home automation, until BAM, another acronym manages to seep its way into your computer via an innocent looking press release or a news article.  Now what?  How do you handle it?  How do you figure out the complex inter-dynamics of this new acronym with the dozens (if not hundreds) of others you have crammed into you mental database?  How do you find out if this is the one acronym you cant ignore (or should)? 

Acronyms, by nature, provide an easy to remember moniker for technologies, products and concepts, and are meant to make our lives easier.   But nowadays companies tend to introduce new acronyms to promote their offering as though they represent the law of the land.  It seems having an acronym for your technology or product automatically signifies it as the best choice. 

So how do we stay afloat in this sea of acronyms?  We all gather, organize and analyze information in our own unique way.  But there are a few common techniques you can use to help separate fact from fiction, meat from gristle, hype from newswell, you get the idea.  Heres my version of the RAAT (Redundant Acronym Analysis Tool), a series of questions you can ask yourself to help you qualify a new acronym. 

  • Is it real?

This is probably the toughest question to answer since the very purpose of introducing an acronym is to give life to something that may not deserve it.  Common tricks used to fake realness are the use of such words as low-cost, simple, small and fast, perfectly good but very subjective qualifiers.  Remember that its almost impossible to disprove attributes for a product or technology that doesnt exist yet.

  • Is it being used? 

The best test of the viability of a technology or a product is to see if is being used in real applications to solve real problems.  This is one of the reasons why companies take the wait-and-see approach when trying to make a decision on a new technology.  Take a lesson from these companies and check to see who, if anybody, is using the technology or product youre considering and what kind of experience they have had.  Of course this assumes that the technology or product has been around long enough to have users.  And needless to say, if a technology has been around for sometime and still does not have a significant user base that should be an obvious sign of a dead fish (this usually is not a problem for products since they dont last if they dont sell).

  • Is it truly open? 

We all know the importance of having an open technology.  No company in their right mind these days would come out with a technology that is not open.  The problem is that there are different definitions for the word open out there.  What I mean by open is this: is the technology youre considering truly available to any and all who want to use it without discriminating any particular group of users?   Therere many alliances and industry committees that get formed to establish open standards these days.  Look carefully to see it one company is really pushing the effort or if the partner companies have a true stake in seeing results.  Just because there are many big name companies involved doesnt mean that they are all rowing in the same direction.

The content & opinions in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of HomeToys

Comments (0)

This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.


Post A Comment

You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.

Featured Product

ELK Products -C1M1 Dual-Path Alarm Communicators with Remote Services

ELK Products -C1M1 Dual-Path Alarm Communicators with Remote Services

C1M1 offers a truly significant reduction in transmission time in comparison to other communicators that rely on dial capture or data bus decoding. This can result in quicker response time to emergency situations which could save lives and assets. By providing both IP and cellular pathways, C1M1 provides the reliability installers are looking for in an alarm communicator. C1M1 eliminates port forwarding and extra fees for remote access. Installers can remotely upload/download programming changes to M1 controls over IP or cellular using ElkRP2. Consumers can control the M1 remotely via the free ElkLink mobile app and web portal, as well as eKeypad and M1 Touch Pro apps. Other IP-based software and interface partners can connect to the M1 control over the local network through C1M1. C1M1 also provides email/text notifications for arm, disarm, and alarm events. ELK-C1M14GSM supports GSM (AT&T/T-Mobile) networks and ELK-C1M1CDMA supports CDMA (Verizon) networks.